5 Simple Techniques For constructive trusts case law
5 Simple Techniques For constructive trusts case law
Blog Article
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding arrived at by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the summary or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court may possibly interfere with the summary or even the finding and mould the relief to make it suitable on the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority could be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-recognize the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified by the decision from the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed inside the bank and since only the appellants were posted with the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )
94 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be very well-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within 90 days. If the appeal will not be decided within that timeframe, he/she will then approach the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as the ninety times for the department to act has already expired. On the aforesaid proposition, we're guided by the decision with the Supreme Court while in the case of Dr.
The case addresses a range of issues such as, environmental protection, and an expansive interpretation with the right to life.
The reason for this difference is that these civil law jurisdictions adhere to your tradition that the reader should have the capacity to deduce the logic from the decision and the statutes.[4]
There are many occasions where death was 302 case law in pakistan never supposed – even more where People nominated during the FIR were not present when the injury or death occurred. The death of the human being is actually a tragic event. But the death of any residing being isn't any fewer a tragic event.
The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to make sure the Act's effective implementation in line with its authentic purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor degree(s) in the topic of cooperative societies. Read more
2. I have listened to the learned counsel with the parties in addition to realized DPG at size, perused the record and observed that:-
Criminal cases Within the common legislation tradition, courts decide the legislation applicable to some case by interpreting statutes and making use of precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. As opposed to most civil regulation systems, common regulation systems Adhere to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their individual previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all lower courts should make decisions reliable with the previous decisions of higher courts.
10. Without touching the merits from the case on the issue of yearly increases during the pensionary emoluments with the petitioner, in terms of policy decision of the provincial government, such annual increase, if permissible while in the case of employees of KMC, requires further assessment for being made from the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance because of funding issues and deficiency of adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, necessitating the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more
The latest amendment to this section signifies the legislature’s dedication to maximizing the effectiveness in the legislation in tackling contemporary challenges related to counterfeiting.
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory law, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory regulation, which are set up by executive organizations based on statutes.